Blog

Test model and requirement management

In prior posts, I have discussed test models as a package of test scenarios. Each scenario has specific requirements. The development of software for the telecommunications industry deals with large systems like OSS/BSS, and requirements creation is the initial phase of the project.
11 November 2014
QA consulting
Quality assurance
Article by Julia Ilyushenkova
Head of Telco and Web applications testing department

In prior posts, I have discussed test models as a package of test scenarios. Each scenario has specific requirements. The development of software for the telecommunications industry deals with large systems like OSS/BSS, and requirements creation is the initial phase of the project.

This phase is critical, as requirements errors can result in wasted time and increased cost. Analysis shows that the later readjustment phase can consume 30 to 40 percent of the total effort expended on a software development project.

Researchers have even indicated that about 50 percent of the bugs can be caused by requirements errors; thus, requirements errors may lead to between 70 to 85 percent of all project readjustment costs.

As you can see in Figure 1, the correction of requirements defects can cost up to 110 times more if found in operation than it would if the same defect had been discovered during the requirements definition phase.

Figure 1. Requirements cost to correct a requirement defect depending on when it is discovered. Source: M.P.Singh and Rajnish Vyas

We as QA consultants advise that two main parts of the requirements creation phase should be separated – into requirements development and requirements management.

Figure 2. Difference between requirements development and requirement management.

The requirements development phase aims to collect information, make analysis, review and approve requirement. As a rule, it results in documents package creation. These are documents about image and product borders, software requirement specifications, data vocabulary and a corresponding analysis model.

The review and approval of this package defines the base requirements version (i.e. the agreement between developers and customers). The requirements management stage includes all actions supporting integrity, accuracy and timeliness of renovation of the agreement on requirements during the project.

Management of requirements includes:

  • Management of changes for the base version of requirements;
  • Maintenance of project plans actuality according to changing requirements;
  • Management of versions of separate requirements and the documentation of requirements;
  • Control of a condition of requirements in the base version; and
  • Management of logic connections between separate requirements and other materials with the project.

The best practices and characteristics for requirements management are as follows:

  • Completeness – Each requirement should completely describe the functionality that will be implemented in the software. In other words, it should contain all information necessary for developers to create the fragment of functionality.
  • Correctness – Each requirement should describe the desirable functionality precisely. Connections (links) with sources of requirements is necessary for correctness.
  • Practicability – Possibility to implement each requirement under certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the system and operating environment. Here it is needed to provide interaction of developers with experts in marketing and analysts the ability for extraction of all requirements.
  • Necessity – Each requirement should reflect what is really necessary for users or necessary to meet external system requirements or standards.
  • Setting of priorities – Setting of priorities is necessary to cope effectively with budget reduction, infringement of terms, loss of personnel, or the addition of new requirements in the course of development.
  • Clarity – All readers of requirements should interpret them the same. All special and potentially confusing terms should be provided in a glossary.
  • Verifiability – Requirement management helps to identify the incomplete, not agreed upon, impracticable or ambiguous requirements.

More Posts

QA for financial applications: 4 reasons why it is a must-have
17 November 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
QA for financial applications: 5 reasons why it is a must-have
Striving to release high-quality financial apps? Read on and discover 5 core reasons why your eBanking and financial solutions need software testing.
QA consulting
Quality assurance
Test automation
Why do bugs get missed
27 September 2024,
by a1qa
7 min read
Why do bugs get missed? Learn the problems and tips to avoid them
Still, finding overlooked bugs after the app goes live? Let’s find out why this happens and how to fix it.
Performance testing
QA consulting
Quality assurance
Test automation
Soft skills 101
13 September 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Soft skills 101: how to supercharge business success in 2025
Discover the value of soft skills for both career development and workplace improvement and learn some tips to sharpen them.
General
Quality assurance
QA to ensure smooth migration to the cloud
15 August 2024,
by a1qa
3 min read
QA to ensure smooth migration to the cloud
Learn how effectively migrate to the cloud by implementing QA activities.
Functional testing
General
Migration testing
Performance testing
Quality assurance
Test automation
Load testing
23 July 2024,
by a1qa
3 min read
7 reasons why businesses need load testing 
Want to optimize software performance or ensure its smooth functioning during peak sales season? Discover how load testing may help.
Quality assurance
Test automation
27 June 2024,
by a1qa
3 min read
Establishing seamless interaction between development and QA teams to boost productivity
Establishing seamless interaction between development and QA teams to boost productivity
Agile
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
17 June 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
Shifting to test automation to maximize software quality
Explore in the article why businesses should move from manual testing to test automation.
Quality assurance
Test automation
RPA in QA
28 May 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Embracing robotic process automation to drive efficiency in QA
Discover how the convergence of robotic process automation helps reshape software testing practices.
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
QA for fintech
7 May 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
Navigating the fintech frontier in 2024: QA’s role in delivering high-quality financial software 
Unveil the future of fintech innovations and learn to refine their quality with the help of software testing.
Blockchain app testing
Cybersecurity testing
Quality assurance

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.